From Sea Urchin Spines to Crystals: Adventures in early Mineral Identification
The science of mineralogy progressed rapidly during the late 18th and early 19th centuries, but in earlier times, it wasn't always obvious if something was a fossil or a mineral.
To illustrate the point, here's an interesting Victorian specimen from the Cumbrian mountain of Skiddaw, once in the collection of the colourful character Charles Ottley Groom-Napier (1839-1894) via the dealer Friedrich Krantz of Bonn.
References
Sowerby, J. 1806. British Mineralogy, volume 2. Taylor & co., London
To illustrate the point, here's an interesting Victorian specimen from the Cumbrian mountain of Skiddaw, once in the collection of the colourful character Charles Ottley Groom-Napier (1839-1894) via the dealer Friedrich Krantz of Bonn.
A Groom-Napier specimen of chiastolite from Skiddaw, his label referring to the invented Museum of Mantua and Montferrat (M&M)
James Sowerby (1806) recognised the elongate features seen in this specimen as andalusite var chiastolite crystals ("MACLE or Chiastolite"), but noted that J. Woodward had earlier (1729) thought that these were the spines of sea urchins ("A black slate holding in it great numbers of spinulae of an Echinus spatagus").
"Mr. Davey having in the summer of 1804 found this substance on the summit of Mount Skiddaw in Cumberland, I am indebted to him for the power of adding it to the British list; and we had supposed it entirely new to Great Britain, had not Professor Hailstone assured us that it had not escaped the great founder of that professorship, Dr. Woodward, who, however, according to the knowledge of his time, considered it as a petrifaction."
Close-up of a cross section through one of the chiastolite prisms in the specimen shown above
Woodward's 1729 description of the material as spines of sea urchins
Title page of Woodward's 1729 book on the Natural History of the Fossils of England
Sowerby's 1806 illustration and description of the Skiddaw chiastolite
This is an entertaining illustration of the progress in understanding in geology from the early 18th to early 19th centuries. In the present, the difficulty of distinguishing organic from inorganic fossils or pseudo fossils persists in the study of Precambrian rocks.
References
Sowerby, J. 1806. British Mineralogy, volume 2. Taylor & co., London
Woodward, John (1665-1728), 1729. A Catalogue of the Foreign Fossils in the Collection of J. Woodward M.D. Part I.





Comments
Post a Comment